Thursday, May 26, 2011

mitsubishi eclipse 2007

mitsubishi eclipse 2007. 2007 Mitsubishi Eclipse Spyder
  • 2007 Mitsubishi Eclipse Spyder



  • Slip Jigs
    Dec 28, 11:12 AM
    I found this interesting, apparently people can't buy an iphone online from AT&T delivered to NY. However, you can still get it at stores.

    http://www.cnn.com/2009/TECH/12/28/iphone.sales.nyc/index.html

    What do you guys think? Fraud? Just a glitch? Or desperate measure by AT&T to stop the congestion?

    Umm - did you read any of this thread at all?





    mitsubishi eclipse 2007. HOT Pink Mitsubishi Eclipse RS
  • HOT Pink Mitsubishi Eclipse RS



  • skunk
    Apr 14, 04:38 PM
    Terrible analogy.

    As soon as I can choose whether or not to buy the services your analogy becomes valid. That will be the day :rolleyes:You do so by exercising your voting rights. The services are sold as a bundle. You get to choose which bundle. In theory.





    mitsubishi eclipse 2007. 2006-2007 Mitsubishi Eclipse
  • 2006-2007 Mitsubishi Eclipse



  • SevenInchScrew
    Jun 14, 09:24 PM
    Did they change/refine the controller?
    Not drastically. The Xbox button in the middle is now shiny chrome instead of silver. The analog sticks and d-pad are now black and not dark gray. And I haven't seen this confirmed, but it was mentioned somewhere that the controller will now ship with rechargeable AA batteries, and can be charged with the "Play and Charge" cable, thus not requiring the older battery pack. Again, I haven't seen that confirmed, but that would be nice. But other than the slight tweak in color, same controller.
    What I really want is dimensions, or a couple of comparison pictures alongside the original console.
    Here is some pics from the reveal on stage. The old console was actually just a shell, with the new one hidden underneath. You can see pretty well in these pics the size difference.

    http://img695.imageshack.us/img695/5066/microsofte32010998rmeng.jpg

    http://img204.imageshack.us/img204/8386/microsofte32010999rmeng.jpg

    http://img810.imageshack.us/img810/4862/microsofte320101000rmen.jpg

    http://img94.imageshack.us/img94/2282/4ghi8h.jpg

    http://img231.imageshack.us/img231/7466/sany1478.jpg





    mitsubishi eclipse 2007. 2007 Mitsubishi Eclipse Spyder
  • 2007 Mitsubishi Eclipse Spyder



  • s.hasan546
    Apr 11, 09:54 AM
    Is this really bump worthy?

    didn't see how old it was sorry :(





    mitsubishi eclipse 2007. 2008 Mitsubishi Eclipse
  • 2008 Mitsubishi Eclipse



  • flopticalcube
    May 3, 02:30 PM
    My guess (hope) is that provincial governments will move left over the next 4 years as the public seeks a counterbalance.





    mitsubishi eclipse 2007. 2007 Mitsubishi Eclipse Spyder
  • 2007 Mitsubishi Eclipse Spyder



  • KingYaba
    Apr 15, 03:08 PM
    I like the mop behind him. Is he the janitor of the data center?

    Quote of the week right here.





    mitsubishi eclipse 2007. 2007 Mitsubishi Eclipse GT
  • 2007 Mitsubishi Eclipse GT



  • bduvinmac
    Mar 10, 10:44 PM
    any one planning on heading here for launch day? if so what time are you planning on going?





    mitsubishi eclipse 2007. next 2007 mitsubishi eclipse
  • next 2007 mitsubishi eclipse



  • jettredmont
    Oct 26, 04:57 PM
    Of course I can see the other side of this. Writing universal apps is not just a matter of "checking a box" in XCode; despite what I've heard some non-coders say on the subject.


    Umm, I'm far from a non-coder. Writing a new app is very much an issue of "checking a box" in XCode. The problems come in when dealing with a years-old code base, much of which has embedded processor assumptions (ranging from hand-tweaked assembly to direct vector calls to assumptions on byte order).

    New code, though, you know that you have to support multiple CPU architectures and so you call htons for your byte ordering and use vector libraries rather than direct calls; the sole remaining issue is hand-tweaked assembly, which should be significantly less than 1% of your overall application code especially if you are putting out a new product (you typically don't have enough knowledge to find the bottlenecks where going straight down to the metal is required until your app has been out in users' hands for a while). With all that absorbed in "the process", the only thing left is, yes, checking the box in XCode to generate the UB version of your app.

    There's a bit more involved at the compile stage if you want to support both UB and older OS versions (Panther, Jaguar), but it's a lot easier to tell your customers that they have to upgrade to Tiger on their old G4s and G5s than to tell them they have to buy a whole new machine!





    mitsubishi eclipse 2007. quot;2007 mitsubishi eclipse
  • quot;2007 mitsubishi eclipse



  • fifthworld
    Feb 25, 08:41 AM
    Agree 100% - as I said in my original post, I don't think Apple are in any way culpable here: It's not their job to set prices for apps or in-app purchases. I also think Parents need to accept responsibility and watch their kids more carefully.

    My only issue with this is the exploitative behavior of the publishers of the Apps - I can't think of any reason for charging the huge prices they do apart from someone thinking "Some parents are dumb and won't know how to stop their kids spending huge wads of cash on in-app purchases. We can make loads of money by using this to our advantage".
    That shouldn't be what in-app purchases are used for: even if it doesn't break any rules, it's not at all ethical.
    I know businesses exist to make money, but they shouldn't do it in an unethical and immoral way IMO.

    Agree. Doesn't matter if parents are at fault or not, like most of the post are establishing, exploitative behavior should not be tolerated.





    mitsubishi eclipse 2007. The Eclipse Coupe was
  • The Eclipse Coupe was



  • MacRumors
    Feb 18, 10:09 AM
    http://www.macrumors.com/images/macrumorsthreadlogo.gif (http://www.macrumors.com/2011/02/18/photo-of-steve-jobs-at-tech-dinner-with-barack-obama/)

    The past few days have been filled with tabloid speculation (http://www.macrumors.com/2011/02/16/steve-jobs-spotted-at-stanford-cancer-center/) about Steve Jobs' health, with reports pegging him as having visited Stanford Cancer Center in recent weeks, presumably to receive treatment. The tabloid speculation was somewhat countered by word that Jobs would join other Silicon Valley tech executives for a dinner (http://www.macrumors.com/2011/02/16/steve-jobs-to-meet-with-obama-on-thursday/) with President Barack Obama to discuss technology and innovation in the U.S. economy.


    http://images.macrumors.com/article/2011/02/18/110531-jobs_obama_dinner_500.jpg




    mitsubishi eclipse 2007. 2007 Mitsubishi Eclipse Spyder
  • 2007 Mitsubishi Eclipse Spyder



  • MacMyDay
    Apr 17, 05:08 AM
    What people don't appreciate with Apple's terms is that they are there as a legal document to protect Apple. It is absolutely impossible for them to define every single situation where they would or would not approve an app, and the fact that they've admitted they made a mistake and are willing to accept this application again is only a good thing. Why people are turning around and complaining about this is quite surreal, as if you truly wanted Apple to make it crystal clear and avoid any issues, they'd be no point them having any department at all to reassess any apps and this wouldn't even be a topic.

    In my companies own terms, we have to rules are unlikely to ever occur or just protecting us - but as with most companies, we're flexible enough to change them if a situation comes up. Is that now suddenly a sign of weakness? It's like in politics: if you refuse to change your mind, you're stubborn and difficult, and if you're willing to budge you're weak. You just can't win, but you'll never win when these discussions are read by people who see the first 10 replies all think the said company (regardless of who it is, cos I see it all the time with Microsoft who get painted a horribly bad picture, which I too disagree with) and are saying how awful they are.





    mitsubishi eclipse 2007. 2007 Mitsubishi Eclipse
  • 2007 Mitsubishi Eclipse



  • txr0ckabilly
    May 2, 01:30 PM
    ...too bad it doesnt work for Bob :(


    Image (http://obamapacman.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/Bob-Mansfield-Senior-Vice-President-Hardware-Apple-iPad-mac-tablet-video.jpg)

    imagine Hawaiian print





    mitsubishi eclipse 2007. Modified Mitsubishi Eclipse
  • Modified Mitsubishi Eclipse



  • tvguru
    Sep 25, 11:10 AM
    Is there shown any RAW cameras supported in 1.5 that weren't in the current version? I wasn't up on that since mine was supported and that's all that mattered to me, but if there are new camera's supported it would point to 10.4.8 to be released later this week too.





    mitsubishi eclipse 2007. Modified Mitsubishi Eclipse
  • Modified Mitsubishi Eclipse



  • jonharris200
    Nov 2, 12:56 PM
    I have four friends who have just bought a Mac. All of them switched from PCs.





    mitsubishi eclipse 2007. 2007 Mitsubishi Eclipse 3.8 L
  • 2007 Mitsubishi Eclipse 3.8 L



  • Luap
    Feb 21, 11:02 AM
    He had a liver transplant.... Alcohol is a no-no after that!

    This is true only if the transplant was because of alcohol related reasons (IE, alcoholism) There are any number of other reasons why one could have a liver transplant, and in those cases, those people can have a drink like anyone else.

    Thats not to say there isn't other medical reasons that Jobs isn't drinking. And if there is, it is unlikely to be related to the transplant.

    Or.. Maybe he just didn't want to drink!?





    mitsubishi eclipse 2007. 2007 - Mitsubishi Eclipse
  • 2007 - Mitsubishi Eclipse



  • kingdonk
    Feb 28, 08:17 PM
    more





    mitsubishi eclipse 2007. 2007 mitsubishi eclipse spyder
  • 2007 mitsubishi eclipse spyder



  • infernohellion
    Nov 11, 08:38 AM
    I wonder why in Thailand it's just a Thai voice-over of the US Version (of Justin Long) commercial. Well, we're pretty much the smallest mac market in the world therefore there's no need for the localized version of Mac... LOL





    mitsubishi eclipse 2007. the Mitsubishi Eclipse.
  • the Mitsubishi Eclipse.



  • liavman
    Mar 25, 08:28 PM
    Federal Agency Will Review a Kodak Patent Claim.

    A federal agency has decided to review Eastman Kodak�s patent claim against Apple and Research In Motion. The International Trade Commission said Friday it would look at a judge�s finding in January that Apple�s iPhone and RIM�s BlackBerry do not violate a 2001 Kodak image-preview patent. The favorable decision revives Kodak�s hopes of negotiating royalties worth $1 billion or more. The agency�s six commissioners will decide by May 23 whether to alter the initial determination by its chief administrative judge or let it stand.

    http://www.nytimes.com/2011/03/26/business/26bizbriefs-FEDERALAGENC_BRF.html?partner=yahoofinance





    mitsubishi eclipse 2007. 2007 Mitsubishi Eclipse Spyder
  • 2007 Mitsubishi Eclipse Spyder



  • Scottsdale
    Apr 20, 12:40 PM
    I have zero reason to downgrade to Sandy Bridge with its forced worthless IGP & chipset.

    I do believe the backlit keyboard will make it back IF Apple continues to sell a MacBook. If Apple eliminates the MB and puts the low end MBA in its place at $999, then I suspect the backlit keyboard stays a thing of the past. If however Apple keeps the MB, I think it will conclude that at least the 13" MBA needs the upgraded feature. It is extremely low cost. I would be shocked if it costs $0.50 per MBA unit, and it seems like a big advantage. I think Apple likes to "experiment" with features so it can then add them back and act like they learned their lesson when actually they just want added sales.

    I really don't believe there is any worry about a Sandy Bridge CPU making its way into the MBA. With Apple's update cycles, it could easily just wait for Ivy Bridge. Let's remember that the only Mac that uses low and ultra low voltage CPUs are the two MBAs. Apple can update the MB, Mac mini, and 21.5" iMac to Sandy Bridge standard core CPUs and not get the horrific loss in graphics performance that the MBA would receive with LV and ULV CPUs and their respective IGPs. I just think the vast majority of MBA buyers a, don't care, and b, would be better off with C2D and Nvidia 320m for another year.

    I will be shocked to see a Sandy Bridge MBA unless it includes a standard voltage CPU... Ivy Bridge just makes much more sense.





    shawnce
    Nov 21, 04:36 PM
    Hate to say it but the website sure makes the company and product to be a bunch of BS... they make a lot of claims with little to back them up.

    They may have a real and useful product but... man they could present it in a much better way.





    DARKJ3DI
    Jun 18, 04:54 PM
    now if only the card slot was not on the back...





    glennp
    Aug 19, 12:35 PM
    Isn't Walt out of New York?

    I thought so too but in the review he said they used the Places feature out in and around DC so it was working in DC for the testing:

    In the past week or so, my colleague Katherine Boehret and I have used Facebook Places to check in with iPhones around our home base of Washington, D.C., at stores, bars, restaurants and even our office. I also was able to check in, or �tag,� other Facebook members with me, like my visiting son and daughter-in-law.


    http://ptech.allthingsd.com/20100818/facebook-places-review/





    efoto
    Sep 18, 08:27 PM
    I agree. Don't be creepy, too. No heavy breathing through your teeth so it makes that creepy noise, and no Fava beans with Chianti for lunch.

    :)

    I'll give that try, and keep those things in mind. The problem being, it will be hard because she won't see the real me, what with no heavy breathing and Fava-bean/Chianti lunch :rolleyes: :D





    Hertog
    Nov 14, 09:56 AM
    It sounds really nice, but... perhaps someone got out the press release too soon. The Dutch airline KLM, one of the partners mentioned in the article, are apparently not aware of the deal and respond in surprise to the news. They also say Air France, KLM's owner, nows nothing.

    The article, in Dutch: http://www.nu.nl/news/885979/54/%27iPod-aansluiting_in_vliegtuigen%27.html

    KLM reacted in surprise at the announcement. 'It is true that there where talks, but the changes of this happening are now/at the moment smaller than ever', said a spokesman from the Dutch airline.

    (Translation by me. I'm not quite sure if the spokesman means 'now', ie. since the announcement, or 'at the moment', ie someting went wrong at the talks.)